Saturday, 21 December 2024

Two Thirds of Alice's Adventures at the Poles Completed

 What a week for my Alice project. Up to now it has been taking anything up to three weeks to make a chapter of the story, text and illustrations. Well, I have written and illustrated chapter 8 in 6 days. Putting this into perspective, I have tried to keep each chapter to between 3500 and 4500 words. Chapter 8 is roughly 3750 words. I am trying to keep to an average of four illustrations for each chapter. I produced 3 completely new illustrations for chapter 8 and adapted one of my own sketches.

One thing I’m very happy about is that this means that 2/3 of the books planned 12 chapters are complete. When I have written the next chapter, then that will become ¾.

I explained in a earlier post how I am often writing before going to work in the morning. Well, working on it a couple of evenings this week when I had the oomph to do it made a big difference.

Well, here’s the illustrations made since my last post:-







Sunday, 15 December 2024

Another chapter written and illustrated

It’s been a busy couple of weeks. A fortnight ago I wrote that I’d finished writing chapter 6 and making illustrations for it. On average it has taken about 3 weeks to write and illustrate a whole chapter. Now with chapter 7 the writing came rather easily, and it was completed within a week. However, despite having by my reckoning anything up to five decent opportunities for illustration, I just couldn’t get going with it. My first attempt during the week just wasn’t good enough.

The trickiest thing about this is that I’d started writing Chapter VIII. You see the thing is that in my old job as a teacher I used to get into work about 7 am to have an hour and a half to do things before the children I taught came in. It was absolutely golden time which I’d say was worth about 2 hours at any other time of the day. Well, I don’t go into work in my new job now until 8 am, so that gives me a little bit of time after breakfast but before leaving the house. I don’t write every day, but it’s not that uncommon for me to dash off anything up to five hundred words in a morning. I’ve already written more than a quarter of the chapter.

So, this weekend I girded my metaphorical loins and got down to business. Thus far I’ve only made three illustrations to chapter VII. However, at least this means that I’ve now completed 28 so I’m on target for an average of four per chapter. So without further ado – here’s the pictures – as usual no explanations I’m sorry.

An Arctic Hare and a Baronet

A ewe in a welsh shawl. Would ewe believe it?

Despite the expression he's a very happypotamus


Sunday, 1 December 2024

Half of my Alice Illustrations are now complete

Okay, so this time last week I posted that I’ve finished writing chapter 6 of “Alice’s Adventures at the Poles, which means that I’ve finished writing the first half of the text. Now, when I’m writing a chapter of the story, I can’t help mentally noting where I have opportunities for illustrations that I’d like to make. Now, by the end of chapter five I’d included 21 illustrations. My self-imposed target is an average of four illustrations per chapter. 21 by this point meant that I was 1 ahead of target. And as I was writing the chapter I reckoned that there were five clear cut opportunities for illustration.

So, here’s the three I made that completed the twenty four that I needed for the first half of the book.

This is a mynah bird and a snail. Look, you will just have to accept that this all fits in the story.

This is a billy goat working the ticket counter in a station. No, sorry, I’m not giving any more explanation than this at this point in time.

Finally this is a railway carriage on the back of a blue whale, surfacing in a railway station that is rather reminiscent of London’s Paddington Station.

I haven’t scanned it yet but there is a twenty fifth illustration as well. Well, I don’t have a problem doing more than required to meet the average, and if it turns out that I end up with more than the forty eight planned illustration for the novel, then so much the better.

Sunday, 24 November 2024

Alice's Adventures at the Poles latest

Right, would you prefer to have a glass that is half full or a glass that is half empty? Well, let me present the glass, and you can decide. During the last week I have finished the first draft of chapter 6 of Alice’s Adventures at the Poles. The story is planned to be written in 12 chapters. So this means that it is now half finished! However . . . – I have not drawn any more illustrations for the story yet. I need at least twenty four illustrations for the first six chapters, and at the moment I only have twenty one. Well, let’s look at the half full glass. I think that there’s maybe half a dozen clear opportunities for illustrations in what I’ve written, so I’m not worried.

The way things work out it’s taking a good three weeks to make a chapter anyway. So it isn’t that unusual for me to do the illustrations only after I’ve written it. But it’s been hard this weekend as well. It’s the time of year when, if I am going to draw my own Christmas Cards, then I need to crack on with it, and that’s what I’ve been doing. I think I’m about halfway there, having completed 8 this weekend.

Sunday, 17 November 2024

More evidence on my Thurstan theory

 I've been looking even more closely at Edgar Thurstan's Alice illustrations, and I've spent hours today copying his illustration of Alice in the train carriage in Alice Through the Looking Glass. Here's what Lewis Carroll said, where I have just included the details of who was in the carriage,

“Tickets, please!” said the Guard, putting his head in at the window. . . All this time the Guard was looking at her, first through a telescope, then through a microscope, and then through an opera-glass. At last he said, “You’re travelling the wrong way,”

“So young a child,” said the gentleman sitting opposite to her (he was dressed in white paper) . . . A Goat, that was sitting next to the gentleman in white, shut his eyes . . . There was a Beetle sitting next to the Goat . . . 

Alice couldn’t see who was sitting beyond the Beetle, but a hoarse voice spoke next. “Change engines—” it said, and was obliged to leave off.

“It sounds like a horse,” Alice thought to herself. And an extremely small voice, close to her ear, said, “You might make a joke on that—something about ‘horse’ and ‘hoarse,’ you know.” . . . 

The Horse, who had put his head out of the window. . . " - and that's really all the description that we get of the carriage and its occupants. So, here's my copy of Tenniel's illustration :-


and here's my copy of Edgar Thurstan's


Just for ease of comparison, here's the two of them side by side:-

I am not a lawyer of any kind, let alone a copyright lawyer, but come on! The case for the prosecution presents the following evidence: - 

1) The four figures in the Tenniel illustration are pictured in the same positions in relation to each other as in Thurstan's , and each of them is in the same pose in Thurstan's as in Tenniel's.

2) This is the only illustration of Tenniel's Alice in which she wears a hat of this style. Thurstan's is wearing a hat of the same style. Likewise, the gentleman dressed in paper. We are told he is dressed in paper, but not that he is wearing a hat, yet Thurstan's is wearing the same hat as Tenniel's

3) The interior of the carriage is extremely similar in both illustrations, with the two narrower windows either side of the wider window which is part of the compartment door. 

The evidence for the defence? Well. . . 

1) The man dressed in paper looks like Benjamin Disraeli in Tenniel's illustration. In Thurstan's he doesn't. 

2) There's no horse in Tenniel's illustration, but there is in Thurstan's and likewise, Thurstan shows a passenger to the goat's right while Tenniel doesn't.

3) Tenniel's sketch puts the viewer looking directly straight on into the compartment at eye level with the passengers. Thurstan puts the viewer above the figures to the viewer's right.


The verdict? Well, I think that Odhams wanted the Tenniel illustrations but for whatever reason they wouldn't or couldn't use them - cost perhaps. I don't know, They 'got away with it' if you like. I am pretty convinced believe that Thurstan was deliberately trying to produce something as close to Tenniel's original as possible with the majority of his illustrations for the two books. And fair play, I think this particular one is a fine piece of illustration. It's extremely detailed with a masterly use of hatching, cross hatching and shading. Taking Tenniel's composition and, if you like, rotating it through some forty degrees or so shows real technical skill. 

So I don't feel any great chagrin about the fact that the illustrations that so inspired me as a young kid and made me love the books were not Tenniel's but Thurstan's. Because essentially, the best of them were Tenniel's vision- just filtered through the lens of Thurstan.

That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!

-------------

I began writing Chapter VI of "Alice's Adventures at the Poles" today. So you never know, I may make some more original illustrations next weekend. Having said that though I really need to be making more of this year's hand drawn Christmas cards.

Saturday, 16 November 2024

My Theory about Edgar Thurstan's Alice illustrations

It’s been quite a week. I retired from teaching officially in August. I was more than ready to finish teaching but not yet ready to finish working. Look, you’re a long time retired (hopefully). So I applied for a temporary position in admin with the NHS. I got the job and began in September. The salary combined with my teacher’s pension leaves us a little better off than we were, as opposed to taking a pretty big drop if we just lived on the teacher’s pension. My thinking was that it is easier to turn a temporary position into a permanent one from inside rather than out. I’ve been loving the job, however the opportunity arose for a slightly different position, doing a very similar job, but it’s permanent. Forty five of us applied. 12 of us were shortlisted for interview. I was offered the job. Even though this was what I wanted and planned, considering my age and inexperience I can’t believe that it has all worked out according to the master plan, and so quickly.

As if that wasn’t enough, my copy of the Odham’s edition of the Alice books, c. 1930, with the illustrations by Edgar Thurstan arrived. Well, the memories and nostalgia it evokes are worth the price of admission by themselves. My copy of an edition that uses Harry Rountree’s illustrations from 1928 came as well, so for now I’d say my Alice collection is complete – although I’m not ruling out looking for a copy of the TH Robinson/Charles Pears either.

Coming back to Edgar Thurstan’s illustrations, the first thing to note is that there aren’t a great many of them. I made it 21 in total for the two books combined. That compares to 92 Tenniel’s. I made the point last week that Edgar’s illustrations mostly owe a lot to Tenniel’s, in both style and content.  This illustration of Alice, the Gryphon and the Mock Turtle is a decent demonstration of my point.

Compare this with Tenniel’s illustration of the same scene –


Here’s the two side by side

Essentially it seems to me that Edgar has taken Tenniel’s sketch and swapped the direction in which Alice if facing, and the positions of the Mock Turtle and the Gryphon. Yes, there are a few slight differences between the characters – the Gryphon lacks ears for example. For the most part though the debt to Tenniel is clear.

Why should this be, though? Well – and I stress that this is just my hypothesis and I have no evidence other than the illustrations themselves – this is what I think. At the time that Lewis Carroll passed away, copyright lasted for just ten years after the owner’s death, However, by the time that Sir John Tenniel passed away the copyright law had changed, with copyright remaining for fifty years after the copyright owner’s death. Thus while the books passed into the public domain in 1907, Tenniel’s illustrations did not until 1965 – incidentally within my own lifetime. So my guess is this. For what is essentially a popular edition, Odham’s might have wanted to use Tenniel’s illustrations, but didn’t because of copyright issues. So I guess they engaged Edgar, telling him to stick to as much of the style and substance of Tenniel’s illustrations as he could without breaking copyright.

And to be fair, the way that he has changed viewpoint, and characters’ positions while still retaining much of the feel of Tenniel’s originals is pretty remarkable, and a demonstration of skill.

However the flip side of this is that Thurstan’s more original illustrations – the croquet match, the mad tea party and the caterpillar – are, to my mind, the weakest of the set. For example, his depiction of the caterpillar gives him face on, which I feel is a mistake as it has none of the care or feel for character that his most derivative illustrations do.

I’ll leave you for now with a question. If you could only draw ten illustrations for Wonderland, which ten would you include. Or to put it another way, which could you possibly leave out?

Saturday, 9 November 2024

Chapter V complete

It has taken me 2 or 3 weeks to do so, but I have now finished writing the first draft of chapter V of Alice’s Adventures at the Poles. Just as importantly, I have now also completed the first 21 illustrations for the book, which means I am ahead of schedule by 1.

Last Sunday I posted the first two of these –




During the week I made this one.



I say it as shouldn’t but I love this one. It’s a rare example of a sketch getting better the more that I worked on it.

This morning I made these two: -




You know how I works by now – no explanation of how they work in the story – although I will admit that the second is meant to show the Prince of Whales.

Collecting, and a case of mistaken identity

I have a story to tell, one of mistaken identity. Right, so, to recap. My love of Lewis Carroll’s Alice books came about originally through a copy of the book owed by my grandfather originally. It was one of the first ‘real’ books I read, and I was always fascinated by the illustrations. I did think that these were the Tenniel illustrations.

Recently I’ve been collecting just a few editions of Alice illustrated by my favourite Alice illustrators. Okay. Well, I had a really good morning this morning. I completed no fewer than 2 more illustrations for Alice’s Adventures at the Poles. This puts me at 21 illustrations for the first five chapters and means I am ahead of the game.

This was why I decided o reward myself with an ebay search. I was looking on ebay this morning and there it was, that very same edition I was looking for. Only, it turns out that it wasn’t published by the Daily Express, but by Odhams. Looking at the photographs accompanying the listings it’s definitely the same. The price was right and I’ve bought it.


The actual book itself that interested me so as a kid, well, that’s in Hillingdon with my younger brother. After I moved out to University I never really came back to live in Nan’s house, and Rob (my brother) sort of inherited it by right of possession, being the last to move out. As I recall he covered the covers in transparent sticky black plastic to preserve it. His heart was in the right place but I wish he hadn’t done it.

Knowing it was published by Odhams has enabled me to zero in on it. Because, well, I’ve had this nagging doubt in my mind that the illustrations within it were actually the Tenniel originals. You see, I’ve always loved Tenniel’s illustrations but I seem to recall back in the dim and distant past realising that the illustrations in this book are not quite the same. Well, it turns out I was right. Looking at photographs with this listing and other listings for the same edition, it says that the illustrations are by Edgar Thurstan. Edgar Thurstan? As in E.B. Thurstan? Blimey!

If you’ve ever looked on my Alice Illustrations page, you may have noticed that I have copied one E.B. Thurstan illustration showing Alice peering up at Humpty Dumpty. This is what I said at the time:-

“I came upon the original of this copy, which is by an artist called E.B.Thurstan. It was published in 1930. Frustratingly I have been able to discover nothing about the artist. But I love the original of this. Yes, I think it owes maybe a debt to the Tenniel Humpty Dumpty, but I think Humpty himself is stunning, and our viewpoint, looking down onto his wall, is brilliant.”

Well, yes, Looking at photographs of Thurstan’s illustrations I’m guessing that his obvious debt to Tenniel is why he never seems to be featured among the ranks of the top Alice illustrators. Because his Humpty is actually one of his more original illustrations. In others he seems to have taken Tenniel’s characters, maybe altered one or two details, and changed the positions or perspective a little, but by and large used Tenniel’s established conventions. It’s as if the editors have said – well, we don’t want to use the actual Tenniel sketches, but see how close you can get without actually copying line for line. The result is almost a kind of ‘I can’t believe it’s not Tenniel.’ There’s no doubt in my mind that Edgar Thurstan was definitely a talented illustrator. An original one, though?

Well, I only ordered the book this morning, so I haven’t received it yet. I’ll say more when I do.

Monday, 4 November 2024

Alice and the Collector's Gene

My son in law Dan – who is one of my best friends as well – and I will both admit to possessing the collector gene. Luckily for Dan his wife, my daughter Jess, inherited it from me, so they’re well matched in that respect.

Of course, the ‘collector gene’ is not genetic. Collector or collecting behaviour is influenced by a wide variety of factors. But it seems to be true that some of us are more susceptible to the desire to collect than others. I have a number of small collections of different things. The fact that I’m only going to discuss one of them should let you know that I don’t feel that this is an altogether healthy state of affairs. But as Shakespeare once wrote – Above all else, to thine own self be true.

It started a few weeks ago. I went looking on eBay for a copy of Alice in Wonderland and Alice through the Looking Glass, in a set published by the Daily Express in the 30s. This was the book that inspired me when I was very little.

I didn’t find it.

I did, however, find a combined edition of the two books with the Mervyn Peake illustrations for a very, very good price. So I bought it. 


Then a week or two later I thought -I’d love a combined edition with Ralph Steadman illustrations- There is actually a method to this. My thinking is I might be able to find illustrations in the books that you don’t see on the internet. I found one – not cheap cheap, but considering the sumptuousness of the book it was extremely reasonable.

The thing is, once you have a couple, you have a collection starting. In the last seven days I’ve bought editions with the Arthur Rackham illustrations, 

and the Charles Robinson illustrations. 

Also, in my hunt I did see a ridiculously cheap edition with Rene Cloke’s 1944 illustrations. And the thing is – I don’t even like Rene Cloke’s illustrations that much. I can appreciate the skill, but they don’t speak to my conception of Alice. But it was so bloody cheap I couldn’t leave it!

Which, you may have worked out, leaves Harry Rountree alone of my absolute favourites, whom I have yet to obtain a copy of. Don’t worry – I bought one on ebay today! Collector’s gene – gotta love it, ain’t you?

If I can speak a little in my own defence, at least I'm not trying to buy ridiculously expensive first editions. It's the illustrations in the books that are valuable to me. 

Sunday, 3 November 2024

Plugging away at Chapter V

At the moment it is taking me a fortnight or more to write a whole chapter of Alice’s adventures at the Pole. I managed about five hundred words of chapter five last week, to which I added another 1000 words yesterday. It’s only just a tiny bit more than a third written so far. However, what I had written did inspire me to make two of the illustrations for the chapter. Here’s the first.

As I’ve said on previous occasions when posting my own illustrations to my own story, I don’t want to start telling the story before I’ve finished writing it. However this one is rather self-explanatory. Alice turns into a fish.

I’m pretty pleased with what I’ve come up with here. I don’ know if you’ve ever seen Monty Python’s rather disappointing last film, “The Meaning of Life”. One of the devices for linking – or trying to link – the disparate narrative elements of the film is a group of fish in an ornamental fish tank, upon whom the Pythons’ heads have been superimposed. Bearing in mind the technological limits of film special effects in the early 80s, it’s not bad. That kind of inspired the appearance of the Alicefish in my illustration.

This is the second illustration, of a crab with a violin case holding onto Alice’s lateral fin. No explanations for this.

In what I’ve written so far of the chapter I certainly can see an opportunity for another illustration, but I’m going to need to finish the chapter in order to make a full appraisal of what I can do. Who knows, maybe I’ll make more than two more illustrations to this chapter? As long as I can keep the ball rolling towards the forty eight in total that I’m aiming for.

Sunday, 27 October 2024

One third is Done

I don’t know if I explained this in a previous post. Forgive me if I did. I’ve planned to write “Alice’s Adventures at the Poles” in 12 chapters. Both Wonderland and Looking Glass are written in 12 chapters so if that’s good enough for Lewis Carroll then it’s good enough for me. So, with regards to illustrations, Tenniel made forty two for Wonderland and fifty for Looking Glass. I decided to split the difference. Averaging at four illustrations per chapter it works out at forty eight. That’s how many I plan.

Now, that doesn’t mean I have to limit myself to only four per chapter, or that each chapter must have four. But by this time last week I’d written the first four chapters – or a third of the book. At that time I had made

7 illustrations for chapter 1

2 illustrations for chapter 2

2 illustrations for chapter 3

2 illustrations for chapter four. So even allowing for my bumper crop of illustrations for chapter 1 I am still 3 short for the first third of the book.

So the obvious thing was to try to make another illustration for each of the first three chapters. Ideally, Alice would feature in each of them. Yesterday I went for it, and produced the three – one of which I was not satisfied with and did it again this morning.

When I’m doing an illustration that features Alice herself then I tend to work with pencil first. I haven’t worked like this for years, but getting Alice as close to right as I can is difficult. Even when I was just copying Tenniel’s Alice illustrations I never got Alice’s head quite right. So here’s the three illustrations in chapter order.

This is the illustration to chapter 2. It shows Alice with the main supporting character of the chapter. I liked the way that I’d draw him so much that I did actually go back to the text and change the written description to fit the illustration a little bit better. Alice here draws heavily on one of my own earlier illustrations although I did change the position of the arms and legs. In case you’re wondering the other character is holding a snowball. You’ll have to take my word for it that this is important. 

This is my new illustration for chapter three. I spent a longer time doing the first version of this yesterday than I spent on either the illustration above or the one below, both of which I’ve kept and think are far better. Well, look, the whole purpose of starting Alice’s Adventures at the Poles was to give me a chance to make original Alice illustrations which I think are as good as I can make them. And that one just wasn’t. This is better, because the Alice figure is better. Not great, mind you, but as good as I think I can do. Well, engaged in this activity anyway.

Then, after all that unsuccessful effort this next one just seemed to flow from pencil and pen. Alice’s head is again inspired by a photo of my oldest granddaughter, Amelia, although in this case she does look just a little more like Amelia’s mum, my daughter Jenn. In the background I rather cheekily used a domed greenhouse which features in one of Tenniel’s illustrations of Alice talking to the King, Queen and Knave of Hearts in “Alice in Wonderland”


So a bit of a mixed bag, but at least all three of these are good enough for me to allow them into my book. And if you’d told me when I started writing it that I’d be able to make sixteen of my own Alice story illustrations for the first third of the book I’d have called you a bloody liar, so that’s something.

---------------------------------

I've been expanding my collection of copies of Alice with illustrations by my favourite illustrators. I bought a combine Mervyn Peake copy a few week's ago, and last week a sumptuous Ralph Steadman combined edition. I love them both. My next target is a copy with the 1928 Harry Rountree illustrations. Watch this space. 

Sunday, 20 October 2024

Another illustration

Okay, today I am not going to do what I’ve done the last couple of Sundays. I haven’t made any copies of any Alice illustrations since last Sunday. Try to contain your disappointment. So we’re not going to discuss the ways that different illustrators have illustrated the same scene or character across the years.

This is not to say that I have been totally idle. For one thing I have been starting to write chapter IV of “Alice’s Adventures at the Poles”. The more difficult thing is that unlike the previous chapter, I have had to think about how this chapter contributes to the overall narrative. Also, I want to go a little further with it than I’ve been before by making Alice herself a little more proactive. Most of what she has done so far in Adventures at the Poles has been reacting to what others do or say.

Nonetheless even with all this to bear in mind I have written about a third of the chapter, introduced a new character and also a plot device which will be used in the future, and I know where the chapter is going to go, it is ‘just’ a matter of writing it. This is not like the block I felt before I could write the rest of chapter III.

I have also produced another illustration. Here it is. 

It’s a larger and more complex illustration than pretty much any I’ve so far made for the story. The way I constructed it – for this illustration out of all the ones I’ve made for this story was more constructed than draw, was this. First I drew the Alice figure. Although this is my Alice – check out the braids on the hair and the dress that she is wearing – her pose is a deliberate reflection of the pose adopted by Tenniel’s Alice when she is looking up at the Cheshire Cat. The legs are in a different position, and Alice is looking to the left rather than the right, but the inspiration is pretty clear. Last week, when I got he Alice I wanted the rest of the illustration just flowed, that’s why I tried to use the same technique.

I followed Alice’s eye line and sketched in the cuckoo from the clock. I’d made my task hard for myself by the way that I described how he was dressed and indeed I did go back to the text to simplify it a little bit. All of the elements of the illustration were worked out in graphite pencil first. So, for example, I drew Alice in pencil, then inked her in. Then I drew the cuckoo in pencil and after much erasing and going back to square one-ing, I inked him in. Then the cuckoo clock. My cuckoo clock is a hybrid design taking elements from several reference photos. I felt as if I was on home ground with the clock, since this is essentially a building and I feel very much at home sketching buildings.

I’m planning to write 12 chapters. It makes sense, there are twelve chapters in Wonderland, and twelve in Looking Glass. Working on an average of four illustrations per chapter, that means I’m aiming for a total of forty eight. I’ve currently made 13 illustrations, although only 12 of these will be used in the book because two of them are different versions of the same subject – Sliver the Snake. This doesn’t mean that each chapter must have four illustrations and only four. At the moment chapter 1 has 7 illustrations, while both chapters 2 and 3 have two illustrations each, and chapter four 1. It does mean though that I am behind in terms of illustrations. What I plan to do is keep making them the way that I have been doing, then total it up when I’ve finished the story. Then I will go back over it and make a plan for what illustrations I should make to complete the set. For example, chapters 2 and 3 are both light on illustrations at the moment, so both would be candidates for more.

Sunday, 13 October 2024

The White Rabbit

This morning I’ve been looking at various depictions of the White Rabbit. If you’ve read many of my previous posts then you’ll probably be aware of how I like to do this. So let’s start with Lewis Carroll’s own words. This is the first thing he tells us,

“suddenly a White Rabbit with pink eyes ran close by her.

There was nothing so very remarkable in that; nor did Alice think it so very much out of the way to hear the Rabbit say to itself, “Oh dear! Oh dear! I shall be late!” (when she thought it over afterwards, it occurred to her that she ought to have wondered at this, but at the time it all seemed quite natural); but when the Rabbit actually took a watch out of its waistcoat-pocket, and looked at it, and then hurried on, Alice started to her feet, for it flashed across her mind that she had never before seen a rabbit with either a waistcoat-pocket, or a watch to take out of it, and burning with curiosity, she ran across the field after it”.

The rabbit reappears in “Who Stole the Tarts?” – “near the King was the White Rabbit, with a trumpet in one hand, and a scroll of parchment in the other.”

By looking at Lewis Carroll’s original manuscript of “Alice’s Adventures Underground” his own illustrations sometimes give us an idea of how he viewed the character. While he didn’t illustrate the white rabbit running past Alice, he did illustrate the white rabbit encountering the huge Alice filling his house. This is my copy-

So the usual caveats apply, Carroll was not a professional illustrator and neither am I. His white rabbit is notable for the fact that it’s really not very white at all. Also, there’s no real attempt to give it the shape or proportions of a rabbit – essentially this is a human figure with a rabbit’s head. Many future illustrators do show the rabbit’s waistcoat, which is mentioned in the text, and in the manuscript the illustration is copied from. It's funny that Lewis Carroll sometimes didn't provide illustrators to episodes in the book which would attract the majority of future illustrators. Oh well. In my opinion it’s not one of Carroll’s best illustrations. Now let’s look at Tenniel:-

The White Rabbit features in other Tenniel illustrations, but it’s always in one of the two guises here. 


You can see that in comparison to Carroll’s Tenniel’s rabbit is truly a white rabbit and it’s a rabbit in human clothes. With the exception of the arms, or course which are human, with human hands. The pocket watch does recur in the work of may other illustrators. As for the herald costume, well, Carroll’s does wear a playing card costume like the Queen’s and King’s. Tenniel’s is more clearly what we’d expect, a page’s tabard.

These next few were amongst the earliest post Tenniel illustrations of Wonderland. The following are copies of the White Rabbit as drawn by Harry Furniss. 

The left hand picture shows a slightly more animated rabbit than Tenniel’s. He is wearing a more sober dark coat than the checked jacket of Tenniel’s. Other than that, though it doesn’t really get away from the master. The arms are still more human like than the rest of the rabbit – it is very difficult to show it holding a pocket watch with rabbit paws. The right hand drawing shows the rabbit going down the rabbit hole, and this gave Furniss the opportunity to make the arms far more paw like.

Another 1907 rendition worthy of consideration is Arthur Rackham’s. Before I show you my copy I should probably warn you that Rackham used some sumptuous, beautiful watercolour illustrations as well as monochrome ones. What I am going to show you is my copy of a portion of one of these colour plates showing the white rabbit. Now, please remember Rackham was a master and I am not. All this copy can do is give you an idea of the way that Rackham depicted the character.


Rackham’s rabbit is dressed in a high Victorian frock coat with bow tie and all in all he looks a little bit of a dandy. Rackham chooses to dispense with the pocketwatch beloved of many other illustrators. Like Tenniel, though, and Harry Furniss he can’t get away from human arms and hands.

Let’s move on to Harry Rountree.


The watercolour on the right is a copy of Rountree’s 1908 illustration while the drawing on the left is a copy of his 1928 illustration. Both of them are similar to Tenniel’s. It’s interesting that he decided to give the later version something that looks more like a bugle.

He gets further away from Tenniel in both of his versions of the White Rabbit in everyday clothes. They are actually pretty similar anyway. Both of them wear long tailcoats and both of them seem rather taller than most depictions of the same character. I’d also say that their bodies are just a bit more human than rabbit too. As with a lot of Rountree's 1928 work there's tremendous movement going on. This rabbit literally has jumped up, but then he isn't quite the jumped up self-important character that I ted to see in my mind's eye when I read the book.

One more golden (age) oldie then before we come forward in time. This is how Charles Robinson depicted him in his herald uniform.



I’ve commented before on Robinson’s two distinct styles used for his Wonderland illustrations. This is in a similar vein to his mock turtle, a rather stripped back, minimalist line drawing with contrasting areas of black and white. One thing to note is the way that Robinson does try to give the rabbit paws rather than hands. I’m not sure that this is a very good idea. You see, to me the use of paws rather than hands is rather undercut by the way that he still seems to have pretty human arms.

So how did my fave Alice illustrators of the second half of the 20th century do it? Let’s start with my copy of Mervyn Peake’s White Rabbit. Here it is beneath.


I don’t know why, but the first time I saw this illustration I thought it looked more like a mouse. Now, those are clearly rabbit ears, so I don’t really know why I thought so. Compare this with Tenniel’s. He does have his pocket watch out. But typically, Peake’s is moving while Tenniel’s is standing still. Like Tenniel’s this one wears no trousers.  but unlike Tenniel’s he doesn’t have very rabbitlike legs, even though he does wear shoes which seems just a little strange, and he does have a tail. I’m interested to see him wearing a bowler hat. Did Peake have a busy commuter in mind? I’m pretty sure the next one did.


This is Ralph Steadman’s white rabbit– well, my copy of it anyway. This is one of the Steadman illustrations that I love. I’m maybe influenced by the Disney animation, but I do think that the white rabbit should be this harassed character, obsessed with the possibility of being late. Steadman, like Mervyn Peake also gives the white rabbit a bowler hat. The pocket watch has no actual hands or numbers marked on it which I’m sure is deliberate. As well as the bowler hat, Steadman also gives the rabbit a pair of pinstripe trousers. This just adds to the self-important commuter vibe and it’s something he gives to quite a few of the characters in his Alice illustrations. I do think that this and another Steadman illustration of the same character really capture the uptight nature of the character better than anyone else does.

Let’s finish with Helen Oxenbury.


While Ralph Steadman’s illustrations often seem to have exploded from his pen, Helen Oxenbury’s often seem to have just calmly been ushered onto the page. I like several things about her White rabbit. Like Tenniel she hasn’t just given him a plain jacket. The spots, like the checks that Tenniel’s wears give us just a hint of vanity. This is a more thoroughgoing rabbit than most, although the nearest arm is conspicuously human. I like the frilly cuffs and shirt too, which again show us his vanity. But it’s the posture and the expression which really sell it to me. Come on, be honest, we’ve all worked for or with someone like this, haven’t we?

Saturday, 12 October 2024

An every day sight

This time last week I was congratulating myself on clearing my block and writing the rest of chapter three of Alice’s Adventures at the Poles, at making the next illustration and at making a few copies of various illustrations of Bill the Lizard from Wonderland. Today? Well, I haven’t written another word of the story. I haven’t copied another illustration. However, I have produced another illustration for Alice’s Adventures at the Poles and what’s more it’s an illustration showing Alice herself again. Here it is.



This was my second attempt at the illustration. In the first I was quite close to what I wanted, but Alice just wasn’t right – the face and right arm were out of proportion. In this one though, I drew the face first and as soon as I completed it I knew that the face was right. So I made the decision to use a graphite pencil to sketch out the rest of Alice, so that I wouldn’t ruin all the good work with the face and could rub it out if it all went wrong. Now, I have previously mentioned that I have used my oldest granddaughter, Amelia, as my face model and this time Alice really, really looks like her.

I finished Alice before tackling anything else in the illustration because I knew that I could do the polar bear and an appropriate background. That’s not being boastful – I think we all have subjects we know that we can cope with and a polar bear like that is one of mine. In case you’re wondering, the polar bear is standing in a willow pattern bowl. An every day sight down our way.

I won’t lie, I am so delighted with this illustration that it currently adorns the frontispiece of the story as well as featuring in the appropriate portion of the text.

Sunday, 6 October 2024

There Goes Bill

You already know that it’s hard for me to find time for drawing in the evenings since starting my new job so I won’t go through all that again. Still, this weekend I’ve managed to work through the block I’ve had on writing the next chapter of “Alice’s Adventures at the Pole”. I haven’t finished it yet, but I think about 1000 more words will do it and I know exactly what to write and how to get to the end of the chapter. I’m just not forcing it. I will possibly finish writing the chapter this evening.

In celebration I spent quite a bit of time yesterday working on an illustration. In my first illustration showing Alice’s features I spent a long time before getting it right and the final version was actually my third attempt. Well, yesterday I spent quite a long time on the first attempt at the next illustration, before realising that it wasn’t going to work. 

Yes, that is a Walrus, and yes, I am conscious that one of the most famous and beloved poems in the Alice books is “The Walrus and the Carpenter” recited by Tweedledum and Tweedledee in Looking Glass. Well, this is the same character. If it was good enough for Lewis Carroll to resurrect characters from the first book in the second, then it’s certainly good enough for me. I shan’t at the moment explain just how he features in the story though.

The connections with Tenniel’s Walrus are fairly obvious. Although my head is more detailed than Tenniel’s, the clothes he wears are very similar, with the spotted bow tie being the most obvious difference. Tenniel’s wears a plain bow tie. However I did do something different with the flippers. Tenniel’s walrus has front flippers that are rather more like a seal's. They are a little more elongated than a walrus’ flippers and they have little definition. With my walrus I exaggerated the qualities that make a walrus’ flippers different from a seal’s, shortening them a little and highlighting some of the detail.

------------------------------

Well, that’s my Alice story and illustrations. On Friday I made some more copies. Last week I looked at the way some different illustrators chose to illustrate the Hatter. This week I wanted to look at another character who I think is difficult to be original with, namely, Bill the Lizard.

This is what Lewis Carroll wrote,

“she made out the words: “Where’s the other ladder?—Why, I hadn’t to bring but one; Bill’s got the other—Bill! fetch it here, lad!—Here, put ’em up at this corner—No, tie ’em together first—they don’t reach half high enough yet—Oh! they’ll do well enough; don’t be particular—Here, Bill! catch hold of this rope—Will the roof bear?—Mind that loose slate—Oh, it’s coming down! Heads below!” (a loud crash)—“Now, who did that?—It was Bill, I fancy—Who’s to go down the chimney?—Nay, I shan’t! You do it!—That I won’t, then!—Bill’s to go down—Here, Bill! the master says you’re to go down the chimney!”

“Oh! So Bill’s got to come down the chimney, has he?” said Alice to herself. “Shy, they seem to put everything upon Bill! I wouldn’t be in Bill’s place for a good deal: this fireplace is narrow, to be sure; but I think I can kick a little!”

She drew her foot as far down the chimney as she could, and waited till she heard a little animal (she couldn’t guess of what sort it was) scratching and scrambling about in the chimney close above her: then, saying to herself “This is Bill,” she gave one sharp kick, and waited to see what would happen next.

The first thing she heard was a general chorus of “There goes Bill!” 

This little episode where giant Alice boots Bill the Lizard back up out of the chimney has proved a very attractive one to illustrators through the years. Now, I do think that a lot of illustrators have drawn on Tenniel’s illustration of Bill. However, I also believe that Tenniel himself drew on Lewis Carroll’s original.

If you’ve followed my blog posts on the illustrations of the Alice books, then you’ll probably know that Lewis Carroll first wrote some of his stories down at the urging of Alice Liddell, and presented the handwritten manuscript to her as a gift for Christmas 1864. The manuscript contained over 30 of Carroll’s own illustrations to the story. It is now in the British Library.

Carroll took advice about publishing the story with his own illustrations after which he engaged John Tenniel to provide the illustrations. So before we look at any of Carroll’s illustrations let’s accept a couple of facts.

Lewis Carroll never claimed to be an artist or an illustrator.

The first facsimile of Carroll’s original manuscript was never published until a relatively short while ago, so during his lifetime only a handful of people would ever have seen his illustrations.

So, bearing that in mind, here’s my copy of Carroll’s own Bill illustration.

I’ve never copied one of his illustrations before, partly because he was an amateur, and I’ve been afraid that my amateurish deficiencies might magnify his. I think that the Bill illustration is one of his better ones. For one thing the mathematician clearly knew a bit about perspective, from the way he drew the roof and chimneys. It looks to me as if, like many young men of his class and background, he probably had lessons in drawing when he was growing up, as he does use some shading and I’ve already mentioned the perspective.

Okay, now let’s have a look at Tenniel’s –

So one glance comparing the two shows that this is the work of a very accomplished masterful illustrator, while Carroll’s is the work of an amateur. Tenniel’s Bill is more lizard like as you’d expect. He was a master of shading and uses it far more effectively and extensively than Carroll could. He knows that Bill and the chimney are what’s important to the scene so doesn’t include any more than this.

Now look again and see just how Tenniel has drawn (pardon the pun) from Carroll. Both Bills are in pretty similar positions. The shape of the tail makes me think of a snake rising from a snake charmer’s basket. Carroll’s Bill seems to hover in mid-air, while the only thing about Tenniel’s illustration to suggest any movement at all is the smoke rising from the pot underneath him.



Compare this with the copy I’ve recently made of Harry Rountree’s Bill.

The composition to me draws on Tenniel’s which as we’ve seen draws on Carroll’s. Like Tenniel, we see the chimney pot and Bill coming out of it, just as with Tenniel. As fine an illustrator as Harry Rountree, though, wouldn’t just largely copy Tenniel. So he has Bill upside down, which to my mind works really well. Harry Rountree was renowned through his life as a great illustrator of animals and birds, and his Bill is even more convincingly Saurian than Tenniel’s. Unlike Tenniel, Rountree uses motion lines and has soot rather than smoke being expelled with Bill. This gives it a really explosive quality. It’s my favourite illustration of the scene.

We’ve seen before that one of the illustrators who often got further away from Tenniel than most others was Mervyn Peake. Here’s his Bill.

Like Rountree he chooses to use motion lines, but doesn’t depict the chimney. Bill’s whole body is curved sinuously and he’s fully clothed. It’s an interesting choice, but for me it’s a rare occasion when one of Mervyn Peake’s illustrations doesn’t somehow give the scene the movement that you’d expect based on what he achieved with other scenes from the story.

So I’ll finish this post with a look at my copy of what Ralph Steadman did with this scene.

It’s very easy to look at Ralph Steadman’s illustrations of both Alice books and say, well, they’re nothing like Tenniel’s. And of course when you put them side by side it’s far easier to see the differences than the similarities. But it’s still Bill rising head first out of the chimney – and that’s what Tenniel drew. This has far more of an explosive quality than Tenniel’s – like Harry Rountree he uses motion lines underneath Bill, and there’s soot being expelled along with the lizard. The originality of this sketch, apart from the comical expression on Bill’s face, is the way his cap is rising faster than he is, suggested by the motion lines. I’m intrigued that Ralph Steadman gave him a cap – was he possibly influenced in this by the depiction of Bill in the Disney film of the fifties?