I don’t get it
In my last post I gave the damning verdict that the
Crawford and Black sketchbook is ‘just about usable’. This rather unkind
observation was prompted by the thinness of the paper, which means it allows
fine liner to bleed through and also the surface which is more resistant to the
pen than I like. Here’s a recent sketch I made in it.
![]() |
| That's not dirt on the right of the picture. That's where the fineliner from the sketch on the other side of the page has bled through. |
![]() |
| Shiver me timbers, yo ho ho and dare I say it, a bottle of rum into the bargain. I was very pleasantly surprised with the brightness of the colours |
It’s kind of counter intuitive. My mind tells me that paper
that is 115gsm like this should be quite a bit worse when you use watercolour
on it. I think that the next thing will be, when I have time, to do a full
watercolour landscape in it to see how it works out.
As for fine liner, the bleeding through is really annoying. I don’t find it a forgiving or enjoyable paper to work on. But the results aren’t necessarily that bad as I think I’m starting to get to grips with it. See what you think. These were both made in the Crawford and Black sketchbook.
![]() |
| This is a response to a prompt in the Daily Drawing Challenge group on Facebook - 0.2mm fine liner |
![]() |
| This is Ongar station, back in the days when it was the very last station on the end of the Central Line. |
That’s
something.
--------------------
Yesterday I introduced you to the Nassau sketchbook I
started last week. Here’s a couple of the pictures:-
![]() |
| North American Bison - 0.2mm fine liner Nassau sketchbook |
![]() |
| Joe Louis - 0.2mm fine liner. This was a response to a prompt in the Facebook group Daily Drawing Challenge |






No comments:
Post a Comment