Time is getting on. In a couple of days I’m off on the great summer Sketchpedition of 2024. This has give me some oomph to finish off the tunnels. Here they are:-
Woolwich Foot Tunnel
You know, when you hear the word Woolwich, you might not have anything specific come to your mind, especially if you’re not from London or the South East. But if the name does mean anything to you, there’s a number of things that might be, depending on your age. You might be interested in the fact that the very first McDonalds in the UK opened in Woolwich – and it’s still there. If you’re of an older generation you maybe think of the Woolwich Ferry. Well, we’ll see about ferries in the fulness of time. Most likely, if you thought anything you thought Barrier, since Woolwich is home to the Woolwich Flood Barrier across the Thames.
Well, the foot tunnel has nothing to do with this.
The Thames Flood Barrier at Woolwich does have a tunnel
linking the gates and the banks of the river, but it’s certainly not open to
you and to me, being a service tunnel and therefore not part of my remit.
No, we’re here in Woolwich to look at the Woolwich foot
tunnel. Like the slightly earlier Greenwich Foot Tunnel, the Woolwich tunnel
was the result largely of energetic lobbying by working class politician Will
Crooks. The Woolwich tunnel is longer than the Greenwich Tunnel, and it has
about 1000 users a day on average compared with the 4000 on average who use the
Greenwich Tunnel each day. Like
Greenwich the tunnel walls are lined with white glazed tiles, although there’s
none of the temporary war damage repairs
which are still so glaringly obvious in the former. The entrances to the tunnel
are similar to Greenwich, but the lack of a dome means that I prefer the
Greenwich entrances.
I only ever used the tunnel once, forty years ago so I
can’t say if this is in anyway unusual but on both crossings I was the only
person in the tunnel.
In 2010 the tunnel was closed when structural weaknesses
were discovered. At its deepest point the roof of the tunnel is less than 10
feet below the riverbed. It reopened late in 2011.
One thing I can’t tell you is whether you can cycle in it
officially. I’ve read several websites saying you can at off peak times, but
the official Woolwich Tunnel website states categorically that cyclists are
expected to dismount at all times. So, I guess you pays yer money and takes yer
chance on that one.
Elizabeth Line Tunnel – Custom House to
Woolwich
Right then. When I was a kid, life was a lot simpler. You had London Underground trains, the Tube as we called even the above ground sections, and you had British Railways. Yes, it was complicated a little by the Waterloo and City Line which looked like a tube line, appeared on the Tube map, but was actually a British Rail line, but since this was only one tiny line between two stations we could forget about it for most of the time. Nowadays we have the London Underground, the London Overground, the Docklands Light Railway and the Elizabeth Line, all under the same Transport for London branding, yet all separate entities. The Underground spends more of its time overground than underground while the Overground goes underground in places. It can all be quite confusing. Ironically the Waterloo and City Line is now part of the London Underground network, so let’s at least be grateful for small mercies.
The Underground Lines of London built in the fifty years
before the First World War, still form the core of the network in Central
London but were never designed to cope with a population of nearly 9 million
people. Even with the various extensions to the network since and with the
additions of the Victoria and Jubilee lines, even before 2000 it was obvious
that the network was struggling to cope with the volume of passengers. The
Crossrail Project to alleviate the problem was first discussed in 2001. In 2008
the route was settled and Parliamentary Approval secured. Work began on what
would become The Elizabeth Line in 2009.
Boring of the tunnels took 7 years, which is hardly
surprising considering how congested Central London is. Crossrail was the
largest engineering project in Europe at the time. The original opening of the
line was scheduled for 2018, but this was delayed and then delayed again due to
the Covid 19 pandemic. The line opened in 2022.
There are many differences between the Elizabeth Line and
the lines of the London Underground. The tunnels have a wider diameter, and the
trains are longer, bigger and carry many more passengers. At the time of
writing in 2024 it is such a success that it’s estimated that one in seven of
all rail journeys in the UK are taken on the Elizabeth Line. The line passes
through Central London but it’s much longer than any Underground Line,
stretching from Reading in the West to Shenfield in the East, and there are
plans and proposals to extend it as far afield as Southend airport. Its 41
stations compare with 60 on the District Line for example, and the greater
distances between stops allow the trains to travel at a higher average speed
than the Underground.
So, the Elizabeth Line’s cross river tunnel links Custom
House, already a DLR station, with Woolwich, on a spur which ends at the next
station at Abbey Wood. In the early days of the Crossrail proposal there was
not going to be a station at Woolwich. However involvement with Greenwich
Borough Council and the Berkely Homes Development Group with he cost of a new
Woolwich station meant that Woolwich was included by the time that
Parliamentary Approval was gained.
DLR tunnel – Woolwich Arsenal to King George
Woolwich Arsenal station is shared between the DLR and national
rail. The DLR platforms are underground and the end of this section of the DLR.
Trains arrive at and depart from either side of an island platform. The station
is the end of the line extending out to London City Airport which was built
between 2005 and 2009, and opened in the latter year.
The DLR tunnel under the Thames to King George V is not
without interest, since it curves around so much that trains departing Woolwich
Arsenal head eastwards, while the tunnel curves westwards under the river.
As for King George V station in North Woolwich itself, well
I don’t have a great deal to say about it. The station platforms are a distance
from the tunnel and are above ground. The station was opened in 2005 even
though it would be four years before the tunnel to Woolwich was completed and
Woolwich DLR platforms were open. Every time I’ve visited the platforms have
always struck me as a bit bleak and the exterior of the station is pretty
uninspiring.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn’t done yet. Not quite. You see, I’ve missed out
something obvious. The first tunnel beneath the Thames opened in 1840. The
first London Bridge was built in about 50AD. In the 1990s remains of a Bronze
Age structure from about 1500BC were found in the Vauxhall area, and this may
have been a bridge to an island, although this is still a hypothesis rather
than a proven fact. Yet for all this we can be pretty certain that the first
people to cross the Thames did so in boats.
From the Saxon reoccupation of the walled Roman city of
Londinium a settlement on the south side of the river around the southern end
of the bridge called Southwark grew. A thriving and powerful community of
Watermen took advantage of the increased traffic between London and Southwark.
The boats they used were called wherries. In medieval times Southwark was not
subject to the restrictions of the City and it developed a reputation as a
place where people could enjoy the kinds of amusement and entertainment not
permitted in the city– it was no accident that the Globe and Rose theatres of
Shakespeare’s time were both in Southwark. The wherries had become water taxis,
and the watermen vigorously opposed the building of any new bridges in London
until Putney Bridge in 1729.
Various ferries have run across the Thames throughout the
centuries. The proliferation of Bridges and tunnels in the central London area
in the last two hundred years has drastically reduced the demand for ferries,
but there are still a couple of scheduled ferry services across the Thames in
the Greater London area, and so let’s add these to the challenge. The
completist in me would never forgive me if I didn’t.
I have to be honest, I found it difficult to keep interest
in the tunnels. Most of them were train station platforms and although none of
them are identical, they’re pretty similar and it’s really a matter of straight
lines and perspective. I don’t plan to do another one for a while, although I’m
not rulig out the New York Subway. The ferries perked up my interest a bit, and
I did the last two tunnels and all four ferries across just a couple of days. Here
they are.
Hampton Ferry
The Hampton Ferry has a very good claim to being the oldest
ferry service on the Thames in London. Mind you, it’s only just in Greater
London. It runs from Hampton to Molesey. I’ve never used it myself so what I
know about it is derived from what I’ve found online, and if there are
mistakes, then I apologise.
It runs from March to October and judging by the
photographs it only carries a small number of passengers. But you have to
admire the fact that it has been ging since 1514.
Hammerton’s Ferry
Hammerton’s Ferry has not been running since the 16th
century. Again, like the Hampton Ferry I have never yet used Hammerton’s Ferry,
so I apologise for any errors in what I have to say.
Right. Up until the 20th century the land on
either side of the Thames a this point of the river between Teddington and
Richmond was privately owned. During the 1900s Marble Hill House and Park on
the north side were purchased for public use, and the footpath on the southern
side near Ham House became a public right of way. A local resident called
Walter Hammerton began hiring out boats from a boathouse opposite Marble Hill
House, and by 1909 he was operating a ferry service carrying up to 12 passengers,
each paying one penny.
Despite legal challenges and appeals to Hammerton’s right
to run the ferry service which finally ended when he House of Lords upheld
Hammerton’s side, he continued to run the service for 38 years. I don’t know if
this is true but sincerely hope it is that world famous musician Phil Collins
is Walter Hammerton’s grandson. I know Phil Collins is a West London boy, so
you never know.
The ferry is still in private ownership. Hammerton’s
original ferryboat is on display at the Museum of London Docklands. The current
ferry still operates on the original route from near Marble Hill House to near
Ham House. The current ferryboat was manufactured in 1997 and is called Peace
of Mind. It operates on weekends all the year round and also on weekdays from
February until October.
Transport For London River Bus
Yes, include the Transport for London River Bus services. Strictly speaking most of these routes aren’t counted as ferries, but what the hell, it’s my game and we’re playing by my rules or I’m taking my ball and going home.
London River Services Ltd. are part of Transport for
London. They don’t actually run the three London river bus services, but manage
them by licensing the services of operators. This had its roots in an
initiative by Labour’s Transport Secretary in the 1997 Government, John
Prescott. Prescott was also the Deputy Prime Minister so he had a lot of clout
within the Government and could get things done. This resulted in the creation
of London River Services. It directly manages 8 piers, and has tied in branding
with the rest of TfL.
Route RB1 goes from Battersea Power Station Pier to Barking
Riverside Pier , which is also the destination of RB2 which starts at Putney
Bridge. There is currently no RB3. RB4, which I used twice in 2016, is the
shortest route of all and is essentially a ferry between Canary Wharf and the
Doubletree dock by the Hilton Hotel. There is no RB5, and RB6 operates at peak
times on weekdays between Putney and Canary Wharf.
Woolwich Ferry
So, the ferry between Canary Wharf and the Doubletree dock
is licensed by London River Services Ltd. and officially designated River Bus
Route RB4. The Woolwich Ferry is also licensed by London River Services Ltd.
and officially designated the Woolwich Ferry. Personally I think that this is a
bowing to the inevitable. The Woolwich Ferry has been the Woolwich Ferry since
1889, and even if it was officially called route RB whatever the hell you like,
people would still call it the Woolwich Ferry.
The first mention of a ferry on this part of a river is in
a paper dated to 1308. In 1320 the ferry was sold for 100 silver marks. No, I
don’t have the first idea how much that is in 2024 money, but you can bet your
life it was a pretty penny back then.
The Royal Arsenal was established in Woolwich in the 1670’s
which only increased cross river traffic at this point of the Thames. So much
so that the Army created its own ferry service in 1810. Various commercial
ferries operated in the mid 19th century, but bowing to public
pressure the Metropolitan Board of Works agreed to provide the infrastructure
needed for a free, public steam ferry service and this opened in 1889.
Like may of the bridges and tunnels across the Thames, at
different times there’s been concern over the capacity of the Woolwich Ferry
Service. Demand continues to be high especially with modern HGVs unable to use
the Rotherhithe and Blackwall Tunnels.
The Ferry service has seen a number of owners in its time.
Just two days before it opened for business in 1889 the Metropolitan Board of
Works was replaced by the London County Council. This in turn was replaced by
the Greater London Council (GLC) in 1965. The GLC was abolished in 1986 when
responsibility passed to the Ministry of Transport. The Secretary of State
passed operating responsibilities to the London Borough of Greenwich, then TfL
took over asset ownership and responsibility for operating the service. Several
operators have been licensed by TfL over the years, but the current operator is
London River Services Ltd. themselves. There you go.
Finally, this morning for the sheer hell of it I also sketched the Thames flood Barrier at Woolwich – you can see it partly in the sketch of the Woolwich Ferry.
No comments:
Post a Comment